r? @scottmcm

rustbot has assigned @scottmcm.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

It looks like I need to do some debugging. It's not clear to me why this change affected these tests. I.e., why:

std::task::Poll::Ready -> Poll::Ready
std::option::Option::None -> Option::None

It seems to only affect std ADTs variants.

EDIT: Looking at the pretty print file, before this change, the types Option and Arguments did not include absolute path, but the variant std::option::Option::None did. This uses display not path.

This PR changes rustc_public

cc @oli-obk, @celinval, @ouz-a

You removed with_no_trimmed_paths. If an import in a file exists that allows accessing sth via a shorter path, it gets trimmed. Std is always imported, and some types are also in the prelude. Those always get trimmed

You removed with_no_trimmed_paths. If an import in a file exists that allows accessing sth via a shorter path, it gets trimmed. Std is always imported, and some types are also in the prelude. Those always get trimmed

Thanks @oli-obk. So how should I use with_resolve_crate_name ? Do I need to use it together with with_no_trimmed_path?